4.8 Article

Energetics of ion conduction through the gramicidin channel

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2635314100

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM21342, R01 GM021342, R01 GM062342, GM62342] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The free energy governing K+ conduction through gramicidin A channels is characterized by using over 0.1 mus of all-atom molecular dynamics simulations with explicit solvent and membrane. The results provide encouraging agreement with experiments and insights into the permeation mechanism. The free energy surface of K+, as a function of both axial and radial coordinates, is calculated. Correcting for simulation artifacts due to periodicity and the lack of hydrocarbon polarizability, the calculated single-channel conductance for K+ ions is 0.8 pS, closer to experiment than any previous calculation. In addition, the estimated single ion dissociation constants are within the range of experimental determinations. The relatively small free energy barrier to ion translocation arises from a balance of large opposing contributions from protein, single-file water, bulk electrolyte, and membrane. Mean force decomposition reveals a remarkable ability of the single-file water molecules to stabilize K+ by -40 kcal/mol, roughly half the bulk solvation free energy. The importance of the single-file water confirms the conjecture of Mackay et al [Mackay, D. H. J., Berens, P. H., Wilson, K. R. & Hagler, A. T. (1984) Biophys. J. 46, 229-248. Ion association with the channel involves gradual dehydration from approximately six to seven water molecules in the first shell, to just two inside the narrow pore. Ion permeation is influenced by the orientation of the single-file water column, which can present a barrier to conduction and give rise to long-range coupling of ions on either side of the pore. Small changes in the potential function, including contributions from electronic polarization, are likely to be sufficient to obtain quantitative agreement with experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据