4.7 Article

Quantifying the bimodal color-magnitude distribution of galaxies

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 600, 期 2, 页码 681-694

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/380092

关键词

galaxies : evolution; galaxies : fundamental parameters; galaxies : luminosity function, mass; function; galaxies : photometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We analyze the bivariate distribution, in color versus absolute magnitude (u - r vs. M-r), of a low-redshift sample of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (2400 deg(2), 0.004 < z < 0.08, - 23.5 < M-r < - 15.5). We trace the bimodality of the distribution from luminous to faint galaxies by fitting double Gaussians to the color functions separated in absolute magnitude bins. Color-magnitude (CM) relations are obtained for red and blue distributions (early- and late-type, predominantly field, galaxies) without using any cut in morphology. Instead, the analysis is based on the assumption of normal Gaussian distributions in color. We find that the CM relations are well fitted by a straight line plus a tanh function. Both relations can be described by a shallow CM trend (slopes of about -0.04, -0.05) plus a steeper transition in the average galaxy properties over about 2 mag. The midpoints of the transitions (M-r = - 19.8 and -20.8 for the red and blue distributions, respectively) occur around 2 x 10(10) M-. after converting luminosities to stellar mass. Separate luminosity functions are obtained for the two distributions. The red distribution has a more luminous characteristic magnitude and a shallower faint-end slope (M-* = - 21.5, alpha = - 0.8) compared to the blue distribution (alpha approximate to -1.3, depending on the parameterization). These are approximately converted to galaxy stellar mass functions. The red distribution galaxies have a higher number density per magnitude for masses greater than about 3 x 10(10) M-.. Using a simple merger model, we show that the differences between the two functions are consistent with the red distribution being formed from major galaxy mergers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据