4.7 Article

Diagnosing a distributed hydrologic model for two high-elevation forested catchments based on detailed stand- and basin-scale data

期刊

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
卷 40, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2003WR002414

关键词

snow; radiation; evaporation; soil moisture; streamflow; DHSVM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

[1] This study evaluates the performance and internal structure of the distributed hydrology soil vegetation model (DHSVM) using 1998 - 2001 data collected at Upper Penticton Creek, British Columbia, Canada. It is shown that clear-cut snowmelt rates calculated using data-derived snow albedo curves are in agreement with observed lysimeter outflow. Measurements in a forest stand with 50% air crown closure suggest that the fraction of shortwave radiation transmitted through the canopy is 0.18 - 0.28 while the hemispherical canopy view factor controlling longwave radiation fluxes to the forest snowpack is estimated at 0.81 +/- 0.07. DHSVM overestimates shortwave transmittance (0.50) and underestimates the view factor ( 0.50). An alternative forest radiation balance is formulated that is consistent with the measurements. This new formulation improves model efficiency in simulating streamflow from 0.84 to 0.91 due to greater early season melt that results from the enhanced importance of longwave radiation below the canopy. The model captures differences in canopy rainfall interception between small and large storms, tree transpiration measured over a 6-day summer period, and differences in soil moisture between a dry and a wet summer. While the model was calibrated to 1999 snow water equivalent (SWE) and hydrograph data for the untreated control basin, it successfully simulates forest and clear-cut SWE and streamflow for the 3 other years and 4 years of preharvesting and postharvesting streamflow for the second basin. Comparison of model states with the large array of observations suggests that the modified model provides a reliable tool for assessing forest management impacts in the region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据