4.7 Article

Effects of Long-Term Exposure to Free Nε-(Carboxymethyl)lysine on Rats Fed a High-Fat Diet

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 63, 期 51, 页码 10995-11001

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b05750

关键词

advanced glycation end products; N-epsilon-(carboxymethyl)lysine; tissues accumulation; blood glucose; high-fat diet

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB720801]
  2. Special Project of National Major Scientific Equipment Development of China [2011YQ170067]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently correlation studies between dietary advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and the progression of chronic diseases have attracted much attention. To explore the impact of dietary AGEs on the health risk of people consuming a high-fat diet (HFD), male Sprague Dawley rats were used as the research subject. Under HFD, free N-epsilon-(carboxymethyl)lysine (CML, a major AGE, 60 mg/kg body weight/day) was administered by gavage for 12 consecutive weeks. The results indicated that protein-bound CML accumulation in the kidney, heart, lung, pancreas, and muscle significantly increased to 178 +/- 36, 161 +/- 2, 106 +/- 11, 39 +/- 8, and 141 +/- 20 mu g/g dry matter, respectively, compared to HFD control levels of 86 +/- 9, 127 +/- 10, 89 +/- 6, 23 +/- 2, and 95 +/- 3 mu g/g dry matter, whereas no statistical increase was found in the liver and spleen. An increase of the proteinbound CML might be due to free CML binding to proteins in tissues by covalent bonds. Moreover, the rats' serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration, fasting blood glucose levels, and energy expenditure also increased obviously. These findings indicated that long-term intake of high-dose free CML might be a health risk factor for rats with HFD. This could provide valuable information for further study on the possible effects of long-term consumption of CML-rich fatty foods on human health, involving the progression of chronic disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据