4.7 Article

Effects of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition on microvascular flow after coronary reperfusion - A quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography study

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.08.040

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES We assessed the effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition (GPI) on microvascular flow after coronary occlusion/reperfusion using quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography (QMCE). BACKGROUND Platelets may play a major role in the dissociation of epicardial artery recanalization and tissue-level reperfusion, referred to as the no-reflow phenomenon. Therefore, GPI might improve myocardial reperfusion, distinct from its effects on epicardial patency. METHODS Three-hour occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) was followed by 3-h reperfusion in 16 open-chest dogs: 8 controls and 8 given a continuous infusion of the GPI tirofiban, starting 45 min before LAD reopening. Perfusion of the LAD bed was quantified by the rate of intensity rise (b) by QMCE; myocardial blood flow (MBF) was assessed by fluorescent microspheres. RESULTS No differences in b or MBF were observed within the risk area between the control and GPI groups at baseline or occlusion. However, b and MBF were higher in GPI dogs than in controls during reperfusion, despite similar epicardial flow (p < 0.05 at 30, 60, and 90 min; p = NS at 180 min). Infarct area size was significantly reduced in GPI dogs compared with non-treated dogs (26.9 +/- 10.5% vs. 49.0 +/- 11.1% of at-risk area, respectively). CONCLUSIONS As demonstrated by QMCE, GPI improves microvascular flow and reduces the infarct area after coronary occlusion/reperfusion, independent of epicardial flow. These data demonstrate the usefulness of QMCE in assessing microvascular flow, provide novel evidence for the role of platelets in the early phase of reperfusion injury, and show that GPI is of value in preserving microvascular perfusion after coronary reperfusion. (C) 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据