4.5 Article

Amorphous and crystalline ice on the Galilean satellites: A balance between thermal and radiolytic processes

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2003JE002149

关键词

amorphous ice; crystalline ice; Europa; Ganymede; Callisto; radiation effects

向作者/读者索取更多资源

[1] The water ice on the three outermost Galilean satellites of Jupiter has a lattice structure that can vary from crystalline to amorphous. Amorphous ice is crystallized by heating, while crystalline ice is amorphized through disruption by particle radiation. We determine ice lattice order using infrared spectra from the Near Infrared Mapping Spectrometer on the Galileo Jupiter orbiter. The shape of the reflectance peak near 3.1 mum is diagnostic of the lattice order in the top micrometers of the surface. A narrow, temperature-sensitive band near 1.65 mum, from similar to1 mm depth, is missing for amorphous ice. Spectral averages of > 100 pixels were used for Europa and Callisto, because of high radiation noise and small ice amounts, respectively. Model comparisons show that the surface ice is predominantly amorphous on Europa and predominantly crystalline on Callisto, while both types of ice are found on Ganymede. The distribution of Ganymede ice properties shows a broad global pattern of more amorphous ice in the high-latitude Jovian-facing hemisphere and in the low-latitude trailing hemisphere. The ice at similar to1 mm depth on all three satellites is predominantly crystalline. The radiation flux increases by similar to 300 times between Callisto and Europa, while the thermal crystallization rate may vary over five orders of magnitude among the three satellites ( being the fastest at Callisto). The occurrence of crystalline and amorphous ice suggests a balance between the disruption and crystallization, with Callisto dominated by thermal crystallization and Europa by radiative disruption, and with nearly equal rates between the two processes at Ganymede.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据