4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Effects of bottom electrodes on the orientation of AlN films and the frequency responses of resonators in AlN-based FBARs

期刊

THIN SOLID FILMS
卷 447, 期 -, 页码 610-614

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2003.07.023

关键词

piezoelectric AlN film; film bulk acoustic resonator; texture coefficient; electrode metal; Mo; (002)-orientation; resonator frequency response; resonator return loss

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Effects of bottom electrode materials, included in film bulk acoustic resonators (FBARs), on the orientation of piezoelectric AlN thin films and the frequency response characteristics of AlN-resonators are investigated. AlN films are deposited using RF reactive sputtering on various bottom metals, such as Al, Cu, Ti and Mo. Measurements of X-ray diffraction, field-emission scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy show that the AlN film deposited on the Mo electrode exhibits highly desirable properties, namely, a texture coefficient value of similar to93%, crystallite size of similar to40nm and surface roughness of similar to8.5nm. The AlN film deposited on the Mo electrode reveals a relatively dense and well-textured columnar structure with fairly uniform grains, while the films deposited on the other electrode metals exhibit a granular type of structure with mixed small and large grains. FBAR devices employing an Al (top)/AlN/metal (bottom)/Si configuration were also fabricated and their frequency response characteristics (S-11) were measured. The resonator using the Mo electrode was found to have a superior performance (average return loss greater than or equal to 10 dB at 3 GHz). It is concluded that the positive role of the Mo electrode in achieving the high-quality AlN films and the high-performance FBAR devices may be attributed to the smaller lattice mismatch as well as the similarity of the thermal expansion coefficient between the deposited AlN film and the Mo electrode substrate. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据