4.6 Article

Improving protein pharmacokinetics by genetic fusion to simple amino acid sequences

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 279, 期 5, 页码 3375-3381

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M311356200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of primary amino acid sequences in protein pharmacokinetics, an issue of relevance in both basic knowledge and biotechnology, was addressed here using as a starting point two repetitive antigens from the hemoflagellate Trypanosoma cruzi that are known to stabilize their associated proteins in the bloodstream. A major drawback to their pharmacological application is that these repetitive sequences are highly immunogenic, being therefore the deletion of this characteristic desirable. Based on sequence homology and epitope mapping analyses, an artificial repetitive sequence (PSTAD) was engineered. This motif was tested by genetic fusion to the C terminus of both the trypanosomal trans-sialidase and the rat tyrosine aminotransferase and found to produce a 4.5-6-fold increase in the half-life of the associated proteins in blood while displaying significantly lower immunogenicity. Residues involved in the stabilizing properties of the novel peptide were mapped by a site-directed mutagenesis approach, allowing us to successfully identify another two motifs. Searching databases for sequences displaying some homology, embedded in proline frameworks and associated to shed virulence factors from unrelated microorganisms, resulted in the identification of four other protein extensions. Remarkably, three of them (from Streptococcus pneumoniae, Actinomyces viscosus, and Escherichia coli) revealed similar pharmacokinetic features, suggesting therefore an analogous evolutionarily acquired mechanism to ensure the biodistribution of their corresponding proteins. Our findings indicate that the insertion of defined motifs into a proline-rich framework constitutes a suitable alternative to construct a chimeric protein with extended half-life in blood.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据