3.9 Article

Surgery for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole - Two-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing natural history, vitrectomy, and vitrectomy plus autologous serum: Moorfields macular hole study group report No. 1

期刊

ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 122, 期 2, 页码 224-236

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.122.2.224

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To determine the benefits of idiopathic full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) surgery compared with observation and to evaluate the use of autologous serum as an intraoperative adjunct. Methods: A randomized clinical trial was performed to evaluate the anatomic and visual benefits of FTMH surgery for lesions of 9 months or less symptom duration and visual acuity of 20/60 or less. We compared surgery with natural history and determined whether use of intraoperative adjunctive autologous serum improves the surgical outcome. Eyes were randomized to (1) observation, (2) vitrectomy, or (3) vitrectomy plus serum and were followed for 24 months to assess anatomic status and visual function. Results: In total, 185 eyes of 174 patients were enrolled. In the observation group, spontaneous closure of the FTMH occurred in 7 (11.5%) of 61 patients, with little or no change in overall acuity levels in 24 months. In contrast, the surgical groups had an overall closure rate of 80.6% (100/124) at 24 months, with 45% of eyes achieving Snellen acuity of 20/40 or greater. Surgical eyes had better median near acuity than observation eyes by 6 lines (N5 vs N14). Use of autologous serum did not seem to affect anatomic or visual results. At 24 months, 72 (58.1%) of 124 surgical eyes had undergone cataract extraction. Conclusions: Surgery for FTMH is safe and effective and is associated with significant visual improvement compared with the natural history. Autologous serum application does not enhance the results of surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据