4.3 Article

The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ)

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY
卷 43, 期 2, 页码 85-99

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14992020400050014

关键词

disability; handicap; speech hearing; spatial hearing

资金

  1. MRC [MC_U135079244] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_U135079244] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U135079244] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) is designed to measure a range of hearing disabilities across several domains. Particular attention is given to hearing speech in a variety of competing contexts, and to the directional, distance and movement components of spatial hearing. In addition, the abilities both to segregate sounds and to attend to simultaneous speech streams are assessed, reflecting the reality of hearing in the everyday world. Qualities of hearing experience include ease of listening, and the naturalness, clarity and identifiability of different speakers. different musical pieces and instruments, and different everyday sounds. Application of the SSQ to 153 new clinic clients prior to hearing aid fitting showed that the greatest difficulty was experienced with simultaneous Speech streams, ease of listening, listening in groups and in noise, and judging distance and movement. SSQ ratings were compared with an independent measure of handicap. After differences in hearing level were controlled for, it was found that identification, attention and effort problems, as well as spatial hearing problems, feature prominently in the disability-handicap relationship, along with certain features of speech hearing. The results implicate aspects of temporal and spatial dynamics of hearing disability in the experience of handicap. The SSQ shows promise as an instrument for evaluating interventions of various kinds, particularly (but not exclusively) those that implicate binaural function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据