4.7 Article

Cruzipain, a major Trypanosoma cruzi antigen, promotes arginase-2 expression and survival of neonatal mouse cardiomyocytes

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-CELL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 286, 期 2, 页码 C206-C212

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00282.2003

关键词

apoptosis; Bcl-2; Bcl-xL; nitric oxide synthase; nitric oxide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An intense myocarditis is frequently found in the acute phase of Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Despite the cardiac damage, infected individuals may remain asymptomatic for decades. Thus T. cruzi may directly prevent cardiomyocyte death to keep heart destruction in check. Recently, it has been shown that Schwann cell invasion by T. cruzi, their prime target in the peripheral nervous system, suppressed host cell apoptosis caused by growth factor deprivation. Likewise, the trans-sialidase of T. cruzi reproduced this antiapoptotic activity of the parasite. In this study, we have investigated the effect of cruzipain, another important T. cruzi antigen, on survival and cell death of neonatal BALB/c mouse cardiomyocyte cultures. We have found that cruzipain, as well as T. cruzi infection, promoted survival of cardiomyocytes cultured under serum deprivation. The antiapoptotic effect was mediated by Bcl-2 expression but not by Bcl-xL expression. Because arginase activity is involved in cell differentiation and wound healing in most cell types and it favors parasite growth within the cell, we have further investigated the effect of cruzipain on the regulation of L-arginine metabolic pathways. Our results have revealed that cruzipain enhanced arginase activity and the expression of arginase-2 isoform but failed to induce nitric oxide synthase activity. In addition, the inhibition of arginase activity by N-G-hydroxy-L-arginine, abrogated the antiapoptotic action of cruzipain. The results demonstrate that cruzipain may act as a survival factor for cardiomyocytes because it rescued them from apoptosis and stimulated arginase-2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据