4.5 Article

Low-dose carvedilol improves left ventricular function and reduces cardiovascular hospitalization in Japanese patients with chronic heart failure: The Multicenter Carvedilol Heart Failure Dose Assessment (MUCHA) trial

期刊

AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 147, 期 2, 页码 324-330

出版社

MOSBY, INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.07.023

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The efficacy and optimum dose of beta-blockers have not been established in Japanese patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). The efficacy and safety of two doses of carvedilol, a beta-blocker with vasodilator and antioxidant actions, were investigated in Japanese patients with CHF. Methods After screening and a carvedilol challenge phase, 174 patients with mild to moderate CHF were randomly. assigned (double-blinded) to placebo, 2.5 mg of carvedilol twice daily, or 10 mg of carvedilol twice daily. After a 2- to 4-week uptitration phase, maintenance treatment was continued for 24 to 48 weeks. The primary end point was improvement of the global assessment of CHF by the attending physician. Secondary end points were death or hospitalization for cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular hospitalization, hospitalization for heart failure, change of left ventricular ejection fraction, and change in New York Heart Association class. Results Carvedilol therapy achieved dose-dependent improvement of all end points (P for linear trend, range .002 to <.001). Both carvedilol groups showed marked risk reduction (71% to 91%) for cardiovascular and CHF hospitalization and for death or cardiovascular hospitalization (P range, .024 to <.001 for pairwise comparisons with placebo). No significant differences were observed for noncardiovascular hospitalization or adverse events. Conclusions In Japanese patients with mild or moderate CHF, carvedilol achieved dose-related improvement of CHF and left ventricular ejection fraction; cardiovascular hospitalization was markedly reduced. At 5 mg/d, carvedilol conferred an important patient benefit, less than at 20 mg/d.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据