4.5 Article

Propranolol prevents enhanced stress signaling in Gsα cardiomyopathy:: potential mechanism for β-blockade in heart failure

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2003.11.006

关键词

stress kinases; cardiomyopathy; propranolol; heart failure; MAPK signaling

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL65182, HL65183, HL33065, HL33107, HL59139] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [AG14121] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Beta-adrenergic receptor (beta-AR) blockade is now widely utilized therapeutically for heart failure, but its cellular mechanism of action is not clear. Mice with cardiac-specific overexpressed Gsalpha develop cardiomyopathy with age, which can be prevented by beta-AR blockade, making this model potentially useful for addressing this question. Our hypothesis was that distal mechanisms in beta-AR signaling, i.e. mitogen-activated protein kinases, were a potential mechanism. At 6-9 months, when cardiomyopathy began to develop in Gsa mice, there were significant increases in phospho-kinase levels of p38 MAP kinase (p38 MAPK), and p70(S6K) compared to wild type. In contrast, phospho-kinase levels of ERK and Akt were increased at 9-10 months, but phospho-kinase levels of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) increased only at 15-20 months (when cardiomyopathy was fully manifest). Treatment of 9-10 months old Gsa mice with propranolol for 5 weeks reverted the phospho-kinase levels of these kinases known to be involved in the growth and death of cardiac myocytes. Another novel observation of this study was that there were also decreases in total protein levels of p38 MAPK, p70(S6K), JNK, and Akt following beta-AR blockade. Thus, chronically enhanced beta-AR signaling elicits a differential pattern of altered mitogen-activated protein kinases, which was reversed with beta-AR blockade, raising the possibility that the beneficial effects of beta-AR blockade therapy in heart failure may be due in part to the inhibition of these pathways. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据