4.4 Article

LY317615 decreases plasma VEGF levels in human tumor xenograft-bearing mice

期刊

CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY
卷 53, 期 2, 页码 133-140

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00280-003-0713-x

关键词

protein kinase C; antiangiogenesis; VEGF; caki-1 renal cell cancer; LY317615; SW2SCLC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Angiogenesis plays an important role in tumor growth. Angiogenic growth factors may be useful as biomarkers of antiangiogenic activity since their plasma concentrations correlate with the efficacy of treatments directed toward angiogenic targets. SW2 small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC), Caki-1 renal cell carcinoma and HCT-116 colon carcinoma tumors produce measurable plasma VEGF, bFGF and TGFbeta in nude mice. Mice bearing these human tumor xenografts were treated orally twice daily with the PKCbeta inhibitor, LY317615 (days 14-30 for SW2 and HCT116, and days 21-39 for Caki-1). Plasma was collected every 3 days from control and treated mice. LY317615 significantly decreased plasma VEGF levels in mice bearing SW2 SCLC and Caki-1 renal cell carcinoma compared to control plasma concentrations beginning 5-7 days after initiating therapy. VEGF plasma levels remained suppressed after termination of LY317615 treatment and for the duration of the study (an additional 2 to 3 weeks). Plasma VEGF levels in mice bearing HCT116 xenografts were not altered by LY317615 treatment and plasma bFGF and TGF-beta were not altered by LY317615 in any of the animals. As shown by CD31 immunohistochemical staining, LY317615 decreased intratumoral vessel density by nearly 40% in all three tumors. Only the Caki-1 tumor responded to single-agent LY317615 therapy with a measurable tumor growth delay. Thus, unexpectedly inhibition of PKCbeta in vivo led to decreased VEGF production that persisted after therapy as well as to decreased intratumoral vessels. Plasma VEGF was a weak marker of response to LY317615, and plasma bFGF and TGFbeta were not markers of LY317615 activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据