4.5 Article

A1 adenosine receptor knockout mice exhibit increased renal injury following ischemia and reperfusion

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-RENAL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 286, 期 2, 页码 F298-F306

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00185.2003

关键词

acute renal failure; inflammation; ischemic-repefusion injury

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK-58547] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Controversy exists regarding the effect of A(1) adenosine receptor (AR) activation in the kidney during ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) injury. We sought to further characterize the role of A(1) ARs in modulating renal function after I/R renal injury using both pharmacological and gene deletion approaches in mice. A(1) AR knockout mice (A(1)KO) or their wild-type littermate controls (A(1)WT) were subjected to 30 min of renal ischemia. Some A(1)WT mice were subjected to 30 min of renal ischemia with or without pretreatment with 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX) or 2-chrolo-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA), selective A(1) AR antagonist and agonist, respectively. Plasma creatinine and renal histology were compared 24 h after renal injury. A(1)KO mice exhibited significantly higher creatinines and worsened renal histology compared with A(1)WT controls following renal I/R injury. A(1)WT mice pretreated with the A(1) AR antagonist or agonist demonstrated significantly worsened or improved renal function, respectively, after I/R injury. In addition, A(1)WT mice pretreated with DPCPX or CCPA showed significantly increased or reduced markers of renal inflammation, respectively (renal myeloperoxidase activity, renal tubular neutrophil infiltration, ICAM-1, TNF-alpha, and IL-1beta mRNA expression), while demonstrating no differences in indicators of apoptosis. In conclusion, we demonstrate that endogenous or exogenous preischemic activation of A(1) ARs protects against renal I/R injury in vivo via mechanisms leading to decreased necrosis and inflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据