4.6 Article

Cross-genotype immunity to hepatitis C virus

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 78, 期 3, 页码 1575-1581

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.3.1575-1581.2004

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P51 RR013986, P51 RR13986] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [U19 AI40035, U19 AI040035] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies in humans and chimpanzees suggest that immunity can be induced to diminish the incidence of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, the immunity that promotes viral recovery is poorly understood, and whether the breadth of this adaptive immunity is sufficient to overcome the substantial intergenotype antigenic diversity represents a final obstacle to demonstrating the feasibility of vaccine development. Here we demonstrate that recovery from a genotype 1 HCV infection protects chimpanzees against infection with representatives of other genotypes that exhibit up to 30% divergence at the amino acid level, including challenges with genotype 4, a mixture of genotypes 2 and 3, and a complex inoculum containing genotypes 1, 2, 3, and 4. In each instance, the level and duration of viremia were markedly reduced in comparison to the primary infection in the same animal. The data indicate that epitopes conserved between genotypes must play an essential role in immunity. The inocula used in the rechallenge studies induced typical primary infection profiles in naive chimpanzees. Rechallenge infections were associated with rapid increases in the intrahepatic transcripts of interferon-stimulated genes, even in animals exhibiting apparent sterilizing immunity. Protective immunity was often associated with an early increase in gamma interferon transcripts in the liver and increases in intrahepatic transcripts of Mig, a T-cell chemokine that is a gamma interferon response gene. These studies are the first to show that cross-genotype immunity can be induced to HCV, demonstrating the feasibility of developing a vaccine protective against all HCV strains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据