4.3 Article

Temperature dependence of the Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA2) in the ventricles of tuna and mackerel

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00392.2003

关键词

cardiac sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-adenosinetriphosphatase; scombrid fish; Arrhenius plot; excitation-contraction coupling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent physiological studies on the cardiovascular performance of tunas suggest that the elevated heart rates of these fish may rely on increased use of intracellular sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca2+ stores. In this study, we compare the cellular cardiac performance in endothermic tunas (bluefin, albacore, yellowfin) and their ectothermic sister taxa ( mackerel) in response to acute temperature change. The cardiac sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA2) plays a major role during cardiac excitation-contraction (E-C) coupling, transporting Ca2+ from the cytosol into the lumen of the SR and thus promoting the relaxation of the muscle. Measurements of oxalate-supported Ca2+ uptake in SR-enriched ventricular vesicles indicated that tunas were capable of sustaining a rate of Ca2+ uptake that was significantly higher than the mackerel. Among tunas, the cold-tolerant bluefin had the highest rates of SR Ca2+ uptake and ATPase activity. The differences among Ca2+ uptake and ATP hydrolysis rates do not seem to result from intrinsic differences between the SERCA2 present in the different tunas, as shown by their similar temperature sensitivities and similar values for activation energy. Western blots reveal that increased SERCA2 protein content is associated with the higher Ca2+ uptake and ATPase activities seen in bluefin ventricles compared with albacore, yellowfin, and mackerel. We hypothesize that a key step in the evolution of high heart rate and high metabolic rate in tunas is increased activity of the SERCA2 enzyme. We also suggest that high levels of SERCA2 in bluefin tuna hearts may be important for retaining cardiac function at cold temperatures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据