4.7 Article

Sustained cardiomyocyte apoptosis and left ventricular remodelling after myocardial infarction in experimental diabetes

期刊

DIABETOLOGIA
卷 47, 期 2, 页码 325-330

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-003-1311-5

关键词

apoptosis; diabetes; myocardial infarction; remodelling; CTGF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims/hypothesis. Diabetes is known to reduce survival after myocardial infarction. Our aim was to examine whether diabetes is associated with enhanced cardiomyocyte apoptosis and thus interferes with the post-infarction remodelling process in myocardium in rat. Methods. Four weeks after intravenous streptozotocin (diabetic groups) or citrate buffer (controls) injection, myocardial infarction was produced by ligation of left descending coronary artery. Level of cardiomyocyte apoptosis was quantified by TUNEL and caspase-3 methods. Collagen volume fraction and connective tissue growth factor were determined under microscope. Left ventricular dimensions were evaluated by echocardiography and planimetry. Results. The number of apoptotic cardiomyocytes was equally high in diabetic and non-diabetic rats after 1 week from infarction. At 12 weeks after infarction the number of apoptotic cells was higher in the diabetic as compared to non-diabetic rats both in the border zone of infarction and in non-infarcted area. Correspondingly, left ventricular end diastolic diameter, relative cardiac weight, connective tissue growth factor-expression and fibrosis were increased in diabetic compared with non-diabetic rats with myocardial infarction. Conclusion/interpretation. Sustained cardiomyocyte apoptosis, left ventricular enlargement, increased cardiac fibrosis and enhanced profibrogenic connective tissue growth factor expression were detected after myocardial infarction in experimental diabetes. Apoptotic myocyte loss could be an important mechanism contributing to progressive dilatation of the heart and poor prognosis after myocardial infarction in diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据