4.4 Article

Sialochemical and gustatory analysis in patients with oral sensory complaints

期刊

JOURNAL OF PAIN
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 56-63

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2003.09.002

关键词

burning mouth syndrome; neuropathy; saliva; taste; xerostomia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our objective was to perform concomitant taste and salivary analyses in subjects with oral sensory complaints (OSC), including burning mouth syndrome (BMS), idiopathic taste aberrations, and xerostomia without established etiology, to attempt to find a possible explanation for the mechanism underlying those complaints. BMS is a disorder characterized by a painful burning or scalding sensation in clinically normal and healthy oral mucosa. Taste and salivary analyses were performed on 163 subjects with OSC who complained of BMS, taste aberration, or xerostomia, alone or in combination. These subjects were compared with 84 healthy, age- and sex-matched control subjects. The salivary and taste analyses were found to be helpful in distinguishing control subjects from complaining subjects. The most striking result found was the great similarity of both salivary and taste analyses in the BMS, taste aberration, and xerostomia groups, which were significantly different from the results obtained in the control group. An oral neuropathy or neurologic transduction interruption induced by salivary compositional alterations is suggested as the possible etiology for the complaints. This report might add an important objective diagnostic tool to the clinician treating such patients. Perspective: The merit of the current study stems from the fact that it suggests for the first time a salivary-related local neuropathic mechanism for oral sensorial complaints. This may be of paramount importance, both with respect to the biological background of these complaints and to the possible therapeutic modalities that might be offered to suffering patients. (C) 2004 by the American Pain Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据