4.2 Article

Differential expansion of umbilical cord blood mononuclear cell-derived natural killer cells dependent on the dose of interleukin-15 with Flt3L

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 202-209

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2003.10.013

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. We investigated the effect of interleukin-15 (IL-15) with Flt3 ligand (Flt3L) on the expansion and activation of NK cells derived from umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells (UCB-MNCs). Materials and Methods. UCB-MNCs were cultured at 1 to 100 ng/mL of IL-15 + Flt3L (10 ng/mL) compared with 1 to 500 ng/mL of IL-2 + Flt3L (10 ng/mL). Cultured cells were assessed for surface marker and we calculated absolute number of NK cells and T cells. The cytotoxic activity was analyzed with purified NK cells. Results. After 2 weeks culture with 5 ng/mL, of IL-15 + Flt3L, the fold inductions of absolute number of NK cells significantly increased to 20.9-fold +/- 9.3-fold of the number of NK cells on day 0 (p < 0.05), with 24.4-fold +/- 16.1-fold of T cells. But with 50 ng/mL of IL-15 + Flt3L, fold induction of NK cells decreased to 5.1-fold +/- 3.9-fold, while T cells showed 34.8-fold +/- 18.7fold (n = 8). The proportion of NK vs T cells showed to be significantly higher (1.61 +/- 0.91) with 5 ng/mL of IL-15 than with 50 ng/mL of IL-15 (0.12 +/- 0.03). Such proportional change of NK/T cells could not be observed with IL-2. Immunophenotypes of CD56, CD16, LFA1, CD94, CD8, and perforin of cultured NK cells with 10 ng/mL of IL-15 + Flt3L showed the same pattern of those with 50 ng/mL of IL-2 + Flt3L. Cytotoxic activity against K562 of cultured NK cells resulted in the same level as adult peripheral blood (PB)-derived NK cells. Conclusions. Higher induction of NK cells derived from UCB-MNCs was achieved by low dose (5 to 10 ng/mL) rather than high dose (>50 ng/mL) of IL-15. (C) 2004 International Society for Experimental Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据