4.5 Article

Incidence and prevalence of the 22q11 deletion syndrome:: a population-based study in Western Sweden

期刊

ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD
卷 89, 期 2, 页码 148-151

出版社

B M J PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/adc.2003.026880

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Backgound: Almost all cases of DiGeorge syndrome, velo-cardio-facial syndrome and conotruncal anomaly face syndrome result from a common deletion of chromosome 22q11.2. These syndromes are usually referred to as the 22q11 deletion syndrome (22q11DS), which has a wide phenotypic spectrum and an estimated incidence of one in 4000 births. Aims: To assess the incidence and prevalence of the 22q11 deletion syndrome in the Western Gotaland Region of western Sweden Methods: Children below 16 years of age with 22q11DS in a well defined catchment area and population of the Western Gotaland Region were recruited. Diagnosis of 22q11DS was confirmed using a FISH ( fluorescence in situ hybridisation) test. Proven 22q11 deletion was the demonstration of one signal in 11 metaphase spreads with fair quality. Results: During the study period in the Western Gotaland Region the mean annual incidence of 22q11DS was 14.1 per 100 000 live births. During the first five years the incidence was 18.1 per 100 000 live births for the whole region and 23.4 per 100 000 live births in Gothenburg, where a multidisciplinary specialist team for 22q11 DS is based. The prevalence was 13.2 per 100 000 children below 16 years of age in the whole region and 23.3 per 100 000 in Gothenburg. Conclusion: The number of individuals diagnosed depends on the experience and awareness of the syndrome among specialists who encounter these children and also the severity of the phenotype. The higher frequency of 22q11DS found in Gothenburg is an example of increased awareness. The true incidence and prevalence of this syndrome will only be found through population-based screening, but this would be too expensive and ethically questionable. Screening of specific risk populations would be more justified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据