4.7 Article

Exercise induces hypoglycemia in rats with islet transplantation

期刊

DIABETES
卷 53, 期 2, 页码 360-365

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.53.2.360

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [R01-AR-42238] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-59769, DK-36836, R01-DK-50657] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, islet transplantation in patients with type I diabetes has had greater success than in the past, but the important question of whether the kinetics of islet secretion are able to accommodate the metabolic demands of special conditions such as exercise remains unanswered. Syngeneic rat islets (4,000 islet equivalents/rat) were transplanted into the liver, kidney, and peritoneal cavity (encapsulated or nonencapsulated) of rats with streptozocin-induced diabetes. Normoglycemic transplanted rats and age-matched controls were subjected to 30 min of moderate exercise on a treadmill 5 weeks after transplantation. Although control rats maintained near normoglycemia during and after exercise, the rats with islet transplants had significantly lower blood glucose levels. For the rats with islets in the liver, increased C-peptide levels were found at 30 min (790 +/- 125 and 1,450 +/- 250 pmol/l at 0 and 30 min, respectively; P < 0.01), whereas a decrease was found in controls and in rats with islets transplanted into the peritoneal cavity or under the kidney capsule. Moreover, increased glucagon levels were found after exercise in the rats with islets transplanted into the liver (62 +/- 6, 165 +/- 29, 155 +/- 27, and 97 +/- 13 pg/ml at 0, 30, 60, and 90 min, respectively; P < 0.05), whereas no changes in glucagon levels were observed in controls. In conclusion, moderate exercise caused hypoglycemia in rats with islet transplants in different sites including liver, kidney, and peritoneal cavity. C-peptide and glucagon responses to exercise were very different in rats with transplanted islets compared with controls. This islet dysfunction led to exercise-induced hypoglycemia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据