4.5 Article

Desialylation of glycoconjugates on the surface of monocytes activates the extracellular signal-related kinases ERK 1/2 and results in enhanced production of specific cytokines

期刊

JOURNAL OF LEUKOCYTE BIOLOGY
卷 75, 期 2, 页码 307-313

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1189/jlb.0503241

关键词

sialidase; cellular activation; IL-6; LPS

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [K08 HL72176-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI 42818-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Modulation of the sialic acid content of cell-surface glycoproteins and glycolipids influences the functional capacity of cells of the immune system. The role of sialidase(s) and the consequent desialylation of cell surface glycoconjugates in the activation of monocytes have not been established. In this study, we show that desialylation of glycoconjugates on the surface of purified monocytes using exogenous neuraminidase (NANase) activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK 1/2), an intermediate in intracellular signaling pathways. Elevated levels of phosphorylated ERK 1/2 were detected in desialylated monocytes after 2 h of NANase treatment, and increased amounts persisted for at least 2 additional hours. Desialylation of cell surface glycoconjugates also led to increased production of interleukin (IL)-6, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1alpha, and MIP-1beta by NANase-treated monocytes that were maintained in culture. Neither increased levels of phosphorylated ERK 1/2 nor enhanced production of cytokines were detected when NANase was heat-inactivated before use, demonstrating the specificity of NANase action. Treatment of monocytes with gram-negative bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) also led to enhanced production of IL-6, MIP-1alpha, and MIP-1beta. The amount of each of these cytokines that was produced was markedly increased when monocytes were desialylated with NANase before exposure to LPS. These results suggest that changes in the sialic acid content of surface glycoconjugates influence the activation of monocytes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据