4.5 Article

Additional evidence in support of withholding or terminating cardiopulmonary resuscitation for trauma patients in the field

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
卷 198, 期 2, 页码 227-231

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.10.012

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Survival for trauma patients who receive prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been reported as poor. We assessed the survival for prehospital CPR in our trauma system and attempted to find prehospital predictors of mortality. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective review of our Level I trauma center's database that identified 588 patients over a 6-year period (January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2002) who received prehospital CPR. Mechanisms of injury, prehospital vital signs, and survival to discharge were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-two of 588 patients (3.7%) survived to hospital discharge. Overall, 60.7% did not survive to achieve hospital admission, and an additional 32.6% died on the first hospital day. Patients with penetrating injuries had a significantly lower survival rate than those with either blunt or other (eg, drowning, hanging) injuries (0.9% versus 6.2%, and 13.2%, respectively, p < 0.001) and significantly lower Revised Trauma Scores (RTS; mean +/- SD: 0.32 +/- 0.96 versus 0.76 +/- 1.84 and 1.18 +/- 2.51, respectively, p < 0.05.) The likelihood of survival with RTS = 0 was less than 1% overall, and 0% for penetrating trauma. CONCLUSIONS: These findings add support to recent guidelines regarding the termination or withholding of resuscitation for trauma patients in the prehospital setting. Victims of penetrating trauma with a prehospital RTS = 0 (combination of no respiratory rate, no systolic blood pressure, and a Glasgow Coma Score of 3) should be declared dead at the scene. (C) 2004 by the American College of Surgeons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据