4.7 Review

Molecular characterization of cyanobacterial silicification using synchrotron infrared micro-spectroscopy

期刊

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
卷 68, 期 4, 页码 729-741

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7037(03)00489-7

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Synchrotron-based Fourier-transform infrared (SR-FTIR) micro-spectroscopy was used to determine the concentration-dependent response of the organic structure of live cyanobacterial cells to silicification. Mid-infrared (4000-600 cm(-1)) measurements carried out on single filaments and sheaths of the cyanobacteria Calothrix sp. (strain KC97) were used to monitor the interaction between a polymerizing silica solution and the organic functional groups of the cells during progressive silicification. Spectra of whole-cells and sheaths were analyzed and the spectral features were assigned to specific functional groups related to the cell: lipids (-CH2 and -CH3; at 2870-2960 cm(-1)), fatty acids (>C=O at 1740 cm(-1)), proteins (amides I and II at 1650 and 1540 cm(-1)), nucleic acids (P=O 1240 cm(-1)), carboxylic acids (C-O at 1392 cm(-1)), and polysaccharides (C-O between 1165 and 1030 cm(-1)). These vibrations and the characteristic vibrations for silica (Si-O between 1190 and 1060 cm(-1); to some extent overlapping with the C-O frequencies of polysaccharides and Si-O at 800 cm(-1)) were used to follow the progress of silicification. Relative to unsilicified samples, the intensity of the combined C-O/Si-O vibration band increased considerably over the course of the silicification (whole-cells by > 90% and sheath by similar to75%). This increase is a consequence of (1) extensive growth of the sheath in response to the silicification, and (2) the formation of thin amorphous silica layers on the sheath. The formation of a silica specific band (similar to800 cm(-1)) indicates, however, that the precipitation of amorphous silica is controlled by the dehydroxylation of abiotically formed silanol groups. Copyright (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据