4.6 Article

The change of the electron scattering at the gold film-poly-(o-aminophenol) film interface after partial degradation of the polymer film:: its relation with the electron transport process within the polymer film

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 562, 期 2, 页码 173-186

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2003.09.003

关键词

poly(o-aminophenol); oxidative degradation; surface resistance; redox sites configuration; electron scattering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this work was to study the irreversible deterioration suffered by poly(o-aminophenol) (POAP) films when the upper positive potential limit (E-upl) is extended to values higher than a threshold value of 0.5 V vs. SCE. To this end three techniques were employed: cyclic voltammetry (CV), surface resistance measurements (SR) and rotating disc electrode voltammetry (RDEV). In a first series of experiments the working electrode was a POAP film deposited on a thin gold film whose thickness is of the order of the mean free path of conduction electrons of gold. A pronounced attenuation in both resistometric and voltammetric responses occurs after subjecting the electrode to potential cycling where E-upl > 0.5 V, as compared with those corresponding to POAP films cycled only between -0.2 V < E < 0.5 V. According to the interpretation of SR measurements, a more extended configuration of redox sites appears at the gold-POAP interface after polymer degradation, as compared with that corresponding to a film cycled only between -0.2 V < E < 0.5 V. In a second series of experiments POAP films were deposited on a rotating disc electrode and after being subjected to the same degradation treatment as indicated above, RDEV experiments were performed. Decreasing De values were obtained as the polymer film became more degraded. On the basis of an electron-hopping model, this last tendency can also be ascribed to less compact distributions of redox sites after polymer degradation. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据