4.5 Article

Enhancement of stimulation-induced ERK activation in the spinal dorsal horn and gracile nucleus neurons in rats with peripheral nerve injury

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 884-890

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03203.x

关键词

axotomy; dorsal column nucleus; dorsal horn; neuropathic pain; pERK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been suggested that low-threshold sensory pathways have an important role in the formation and maintenance of sensory abnormalities which are observed after peripheral nerve injury. In the present study, we examined the involvement of these pathways in the development of hyperexcitability after sciatic nerve injury (SNI) by detecting the intracellular signal molecule. The rats that received a transection of the sciatic nerve 7 days before were electrically stimulated at 0.1 mA and 3 mA in the proximal region of the nerve injury site. We found a small number of phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (pERK)-labelled neurons in laminae I-II and III-IV of the spinal dorsal horn in the control rats after 0.1 mA stimulation. By contrast, there was a marked increased of pERK-labelled neurons both in the superficial laminae and laminae III-IV after the same stimulation in the SNI rats. Enhancement of ERK activation induced by 3 mA stimulation was also observed. Immunoreactivity of pERK in gracile nucleus neurons was also dramatically increased after 0.1 mA stimulation to the injured nerve. These data suggest that the rats with peripheral nerve injury had an increased responsiveness to the low- or high-threshold peripheral stimuli in I-II, III-IV and gracile nucleus neurons. Furthermore, SNI rats that received neonatal capsaicin treatment showed a decreased number of pERK neurons after 0.1 mA stimulation in the dorsal horn and gracile nucleus neurons compared to the control rats. Thus, C-fibres may contribute to the enhanced excitability of the low-threshold sensory neurons after peripheral nerve injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据