4.3 Article

Platelet-derived growth factor regulates oligodendrocyte progenitor numbers in adult CNS and their response following CNS demyelination

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR NEUROSCIENCE
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 252-262

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcn.2003.10.014

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To design therapies for demyelinating diseases such as multiple sclerosis, it will be important to understand the mechanisms that control oligodendrocyte progenitor cell (OPC) numbers in the adult central nervous system (CNS). During development, OPC numbers are limited by the supply of platelet-derived growth factor-A (PDGF-A). Here, we examine the role of PDGF-A in regulating OPC numbers in normal and demyelinated adult CNS using transgenic mice that overexpress PDGF-A in astrocytes under the control of the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) gene promoter (GFAP-PDGF-A mice). In adult GFAP-PDGF-A mice, there was a marked increase in OPC density, particularly in white matter tracts, indicating that the PDGF-A supply controls OPC numbers in the adult CNS as well as during development. To discover whether increasing PDGF expression increases the number of OPCs following demyelination and whether this enhances the efficiency of remyelination, we induced demyelination in GFAP-PDGF-A transgenic mice by intraspinal injection of lysolecithin or dietary administration of cuprizone. In both demyelinating models, OPC density within lesions was significantly increased compared to wild-type mice. However, morphological analysis of lysolecithin lesions did not reveal any difference in the time course or extent of remyelination between GFAP-PDGF-A and wild-type mice. We conclude that the availability of OPCs is not rate limiting for remyelination of focal demyelinated lesions in the mouse. Nevertheless, our experiments show that it is possible to increase OPC population density in demyelinated areas by artificially increasing the supply of PDGF. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据