4.7 Article

Nimodipine attenuates biochemical, behavioral and histopathological alterations induced by acute transient and long-term bilateral common carotid occlusion in rats

期刊

PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 49, 期 2, 页码 143-150

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2003.08.005

关键词

nimodipine; transient cerebral ischemia; hypoperfusion; learning and memory; reactive gliosis; oxidative stress

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Restoration of blood flow to an ischemic brain region is associated with generation of reactive oxygen species with consequent reperfusion injury. Chronic cerebral hypoperfusion induced by permanent occlusion of bilateral common carotid arteries in rats is associated with behavioral and histopathological. alterations. Nimodipine, a dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist, has potent vasodilatory effect on cerebral vessels and increases cerebral blood flow. We analyzed whether nimodipine reduces injury caused by transient forebrain ischemia and long-term cerebral hypoperfusion. Bilateral common carotid occlusion for 30 min followed by 45 ruin reperfusion. resulted in a two-fold increase in lipid peroxidation and superoxide dismutase activity. Nimodipine pretreatment (4 mg/kg, i.p.) brought down these levels by 30 and 23%, respectively. Long-term cerebral hypoperfusion in rats caused a propensity towards anxiety and listlessness (open field paradigm) accompanied by deficits of learning and memory (Morris' water maze testing). Additionally, histopathological observation in hypoperfused brains revealed reactive changes in the form of perivascular inflammation, gliosis and astrocytosis. Nimodipine treatment significantly alleviated these changes in behavioral and histopathological parameters. Our data confirm the protective role of nimodipine in ischemia reperfusion injury. Moreover, it suggests the beneficial role of nimodipine in cerebrovascular insufficiency states and dementia. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据