4.6 Article

Vascular endothelial growth factor induces abnormal microvasculature in the endoglin heterozygous mouse brain

期刊

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1097/01.WCB.0000107730.66603.51

关键词

abnormal; angiogenesis; endoglin; microvasculature; VEGF

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS27713, R21 NS45123] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), associated with brain arteriovenous malformations, is caused by a loss of function mutation in either the endoglin (HHT1) or activin receptor-like kinase 1 gene (ALK-1, HHT2). Endoglin heterozygous (Eng(+/-))mice have been proposed as a disease model. To better understand the role of endoglin in vascular malformation development, we examined the effect of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) hyperstimulation on microvessels in adult endoglin heterozygous (Eng(+/-)) mice using an adenoviral vector to deliver recombinant human VEGF(165) cDNA (AdhVEGF) into basal ganglia. VEGF expression was increased in AdhVEGF mice compared with the AdlacZ and saline group (P < 0.05) and localized to multiple cell types (neurons, astrocytes, endothelial cells, and smooth muscle cells) by double-labeled immunostaining. VEGF overexpression increased microvessel count for up to 4 weeks in both the Eng(+/+) and Eng(+/-) groups (Eng(+/+) 185 +/- 14 vs. Eng(+/-) 201 +/- 10 microvessels/mm(2)). Confocal microscopic examination revealed grossly abnormal microvessels in eight of nine Eng(+/-) mouse brains compared with zero of nine in Eng(+/+) mice (P < 0.05). Abnormal microvessels featured enlargement, clustering, twist, or spirals. VEGF receptor Flk-1 and TGF-beta receptor 1 (TbetaR1) expression were reduced in the Eng(+/-) mouse brain compared with control. Excessive VEGF stimulation may play a pivotal role in the initiation and development of brain vessel malformations in states of relative endoglin insufficiency in adulthood. These observations are relevant to our general understanding of the maintenance of vascular integrity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据