4.2 Article

Activities for phenol formation using Cu catalysts supported on Al2O3 in the liquid-phase oxidation of benzene in aqueous solvent with high acetic acid concentration

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CATALYSIS A-CHEMICAL
卷 208, 期 1-2, 页码 203-211

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S1381-1169(03)00516-8

关键词

copper catalyst supported on Al2O3; oxidation; benzene; phenol; oxygen; ascorbic acid; acetic acid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The liquid-phase oxidation of benzene to phenol using a Cu catalyst supported on Al2O3 was studied at 303 K in an aqueous solvent with a variety of concentrations of acetic acid. Gaseous O-2 and ascorbic acid were utilized as an oxidant and a reducing reagent, respectively. An aqueous solvent with more than around 70-80 vol.% acetic acid concentration was confirmed to cause a sharp apparent decrease in the Cu leaching from a Cu catalyst (Cu/Al2O3) impregnated on Al2O3, as well as a CuO-Al2O3 catalyst prepared by a co-precipitation method reported previously, during the benzene oxidation, keeping the yield of phenol comparatively high. The apparent Cu leaching was largely inhibited in an aqueous solvent with high acetic acid concentration in comparison with a solvent of low acetic acid concentration, irrespective of the presence of benzene and/or ascorbic acid. The influences of both the Cu amount supported on the Cu/Al2O3 catalyst and the amount of ascorbic acid on the yield of phenol were investigated in the aqueous solvents with acetic acid concentrations of both 5.7 and 80 vol. %. The Cu/Al2O3 catalyst in the aqueous acetic acid solvent was deactivated in the comparatively initial stage of the oxidation of benzene. The catalytic activity of the used Cu supported catalyst for phenol formation was almost completely recovered by calcining the catalyst at 773 K. The amount of the deactivated Cu species based on a XRD peak at 2theta = 23degrees in the used Cu/Al2O3 catalyst was found to have a correlation with the yield of phenol. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据