4.4 Article

Discrimination between different methylation states of chemotaxis receptor tar by receptor methyltransferase CheR

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 43, 期 4, 页码 953-961

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi035455q

关键词

-

资金

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM008360, T32 GM08360, R37 GM047958, R01 GM047958] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial chemotaxis receptors are posttranslationally modified by carboxyl methylation of specific glutamate residues within their cytoplasmic domains. This highly regulated, reversible modification counterbalances the signaling effects of ligand binding and contributes to adaptation. On the basis of the crystal structure of the gamma-glutamyl methyltransferase CheR, we have postulated that positively charged residues in helix alpha2 in the N-terminal domain of the enzyme may be complementary to the negatively charged methylation region of the methyltransferase substrates, the bacterial chemotaxis receptors. Several altered CheR proteins, in which positively charged arginine or lysine residues were substituted with alanines, were constructed and assayed for their methylation activities toward wild-type receptor and a series of receptor variants containing different glutamates available for methylation. One of the CheR mutant proteins (Arg53Ala) showed significantly lower activity toward all receptor constructs, suggesting that Arg53 may play a general role in catalysis of methyl transfer. The rest of the mutant proteins exhibited different patterns of relative methylation rates toward different receptor substrates, indicating specificity, probably through interaction of CheR with the receptor at sites distal to the specific site of methylation. The findings imply complementarity between positively charged residues of the alpha2 helix of CheR and the negatively charged glutamates of the receptor. It is likely that this complementarity is involved in discriminating different methylation states of the receptors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据