4.6 Article

A sodium zinc exchange mechanism is mediating extrusion of zinc in mammalian cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 279, 期 6, 页码 4278-4284

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M309229200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG00836, AG00919] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS30884] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zinc influx, driven by a steep inward electrochemical gradient, plays a fundamental role in zinc signaling and in pathophysiologies linked to intracellular accumulation of toxic zinc. Yet, the cellular transport mechanisms that actively generate or maintain the transmembrane gradients are not well understood. We monitored Na+-dependent Zn2+ transport in HEK293 cells and cortical neurons, using fluorescent imaging. Treatment of the HEK293 cells with CaPO4 precipitates induced Na+-dependent Zn2+ extrusion, against a 500-fold transmembrane zinc gradient, or zinc influx upon reversal of Na+ gradient, thus indicating that Na+/Zn2+ exchange is catalyzing active Zn2+ transport. Depletion of intracellular ATP did not inhibit the Na+-dependent Zn2+ extrusion, consistent with a mechanism involving a secondary active transporter. Inhibitors of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger failed to inhibit Na+-dependent Zn2+ efflux. In addition, zinc transport was unchanged in HEK293 cells heterologously expressing functional cardiac or neuronal Na+/Ca2+ exchangers, thus indicating that the Na+/Zn2+ exchange activity is not mediated by the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger. Sodium-dependent zinc exchange, facilitating the removal of intracellular zinc, was also monitored in neurons. To our knowledge, the Na+/Zn2+ exchanger described here is the first example of a mammalian transport mechanism capable of Na+-dependent active extrusion of zinc. Such mechanism is likely to play an important role, not only in generating the transmembrane zinc gradients, but also in protecting cells from the potentially toxic effects of permeation of this ion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据