4.5 Article

Perinatal interventions and survival in resource-poor settings: which work, which don't, which have the jury out?

期刊

ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD
卷 95, 期 12, 页码 1039-1046

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/adc.2009.179366

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [081052/Z/06/Z]
  2. UK Department for International Development
  3. Wellcome Trust Strategic Group on the Population Science of Maternal and Child Survival
  4. Wellcome Trust [081052/Z/06/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Perinatal conditions make the largest contribution to the burden of disease in low-income countries. Although postneonatal mortality rates have declined, stillbirth and early neonatal mortality rates remain high in many countries in Africa and Asia, and there is a concentration of mortality around the time of birth. Our article begins by considering differences in the interpretation of 'intervention' to improve perinatal survival. We identify three types of intervention: a single action, a collection of actions delivered in a package and a broader social or system approach. We use this classification to summarise the findings of recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses. After describing the growing evidence base for the effectiveness of community-based perinatal care, we discuss current concerns about integration: of women's and children's health programmes, of community-based and institutional care, and of formal and informal sector human resources. We end with some thoughts on the complexity of choices confronting women and their families in low-income countries, particularly in view of the growth in non-government and private sector healthcare.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据