4.6 Article

Phosphotransferase-mediated transport of the osmolyte 2-O-α-mannosyl-D-glycerate in Escherichia coli occurs by the product of the mngA (hrsA) gene and is regulated by the mngR (farR) gene product acting as repressor

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 279, 期 7, 页码 5537-5548

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M310980200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA 21765] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 34496] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

2-O-alpha- Mannosyl- D- glycerate ( MGs) has been recognized as an osmolyte in hyperthermophilic but not mesophilic prokaryotes. We report that MG is taken up and utilized as sole carbon source by Escherichia coli K12, strainMC4100. Uptake is mediated by the P- enolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system with the MG-inducible HrsA ( now called MngA) protein as its specific EIIABC complex. The apparent K-m of MG uptake in induced cells was 10 muM, and the V-max was 0.65 nmol/ min/ 10(9) cells. Inverted membrane vesicles harboring plasmid-encoded MngA phosphorylated MG in a P- enolpyruvate-dependent manner. A deletion mutant in mngA was devoid of MG transport but is complemented by a plasmid harboring mngA. Uptake of MG in MC4100 also caused induction of a regulon specifying the uptake and the metabolism of galactarate and glucarate controlled by the CdaR activator. The ybgG gene ( now called mngB) the gene immediately downstream of mngA encodes a protein with alpha- mannosidase activity. farR, the gene upstream of mngA ( now called mngR) had previously been characterized as a fatty acyl- responsive regulator; however, deletion of mngR resulted in the up- regulation of only two genes, mngA and mngB. The mngR deletion caused constitutive MG transport that became MG- inducible after transformation with plasmid expressed mngR. Thus, MngR is the regulator ( repressor) of the MG transport/ metabolism system. Thus, the mngR mngA mngB gene cluster encodes an MG utilizing system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据