4.6 Article

Identification of conserved domains in Salmonella muenchen flagellin that are essential for its ability to activate TLR5 and to induce an inflammatory response in vitro

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 279, 期 7, 页码 5667-5675

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M307759200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R43AI48249] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01GM60699] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The bacterial surface protein flagellin is widely distributed and well conserved among distant bacterial species. We and other investigators have reported recently that purified flagellin from Salmonella dublin or recombinant flagellin of Salmonella muenchen origin binds to the eukaryotic toll receptor TLR5 and activates the nuclear translocation of NF-kappaB and mitogen-activated protein kinase, resulting in the release of a host of pro-inflammatory mediators in vitro and in vivo. The amino acid sequence alignment of flagellins from various Gram-negative bacteria shows that the C and N-termini are well conserved. It is possible that sequences within the N and C termini or both may regulate the pro-inflammatory activity of flagellin. Here we set out to map more precisely the regions in both termini that are required for TLR5 activation and pro-inflammatory signaling. Systematic deletion of amino acids from either terminus progressively reduced eukaryotic pro-inflammatory activation. However, deletion of amino acids 95 108 (motif N) in the N terminus and 441-449 (motif C) in the C terminus abolished pro-inflammatory activity completely. Site-directed mutagenesis analysis provided further evidence for the importance of motifs N and C. We also present evidence for the functional role of motifs N and C with the TLR5 receptor using a reporter assay system. Taken together, our results demonstrate that the pro-inflammatory activity of flagellin results from the interaction of motif N with the TLR5 receptor on the cell surface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据