4.5 Article

Autotrophic ammonia oxidation in a deep-sea hydrothermal plume

期刊

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY
卷 47, 期 2, 页码 191-206

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00256-3

关键词

ammonia oxidation; chemolithoautotrophy; in situ organic carbon production; hydrothermal plume; fluorescence in situ hybridization; endeavour; mid-ocean ridge; nitrification; marine nitrogen cycling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Direct evidence for autotrophic ammonia oxidation is documented for the first time in a deep-sea hydrothermal plume. Elevated NH4+ concentrations of up to 341 +/- 136 nM were recorded in the plume core at Main Endeavour Field, Juan de Fuca Ridge. This fueled autotrophic ammonia oxidation rates as high as 91 nM day(-1), or 92% of the total net NH4+ removal. High abundance of ammonia- oxidizing bacteria was detected using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria within the plume core (1.0-1.4 x 10(4) cells ml(-1)) accounted for 7.0-7.5% of the total microbial community, and were at least as abundant as methanotrophs. Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria were a substantial component of the particle-associated communities (up to 51%), with a predominance of the r-strategist Nitrosomonas-like cells. In situ chemolithoamotrophic organic carbon production via ammonia oxidation may yield 3.9-18 mg C m(-2) day(-1) within the plume directly over Main Endeavour Field. This rate was comparable to that determined for methane oxidation in a previous study, or at least four-fold greater than the flux of photosynthetic carbon reaching plume depths measured in another study. Hence, autotrophic ammonia oxidation in the neutrally buoyant hydrothermal plume is significant to both carbon and nitrogen cycling in the deep-sea water column at Endeavour, and represents another important link between seafloor hydrothermal systems and deep-sea biogeochemistry. (C) 2003 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据