4.5 Article

Changing trends in antiepileptic drug prescribing in girls of child-bearing potential

期刊

ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD
卷 94, 期 6, 页码 443-447

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/adc.2008.144386

关键词

-

资金

  1. EC-Sixth Framework Program [0005216 LSHB-CT-2005-005126]
  2. Department of Health Public Health Career Scientist Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To characterize trends in prescribing carbamazepine (CBZ), sodium valproate (VPA) and lamotrigine (LTG) in adolescent females in the UK and to examine possible reasons for changing trends. Design: Population-based observational study. Setting: UK General Practice Research Database between 1 January 1993 and 31 December 2006. Patients: 12-18-year-old subjects who were issued >= 1 CBZ, VPA or LTG prescription. Main outcome measures: Prescribing prevalences stratified by age, gender and antiepileptic drug. Results: 5417 patients (47.6% females) were prescribed 147 111 prescriptions for CBZ (34.5%), VPA (38.6%) or LTG (26.9%). The prevalence of LTG prescribing in females increased from 0.08 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.12) to 0.80 (95% CI 0.70to 0.89) per 1000 female population. Conversely, the prevalence in females of CBZ and VPA prescribing significantly decreased from 1.00 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.15) to 0.51 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.58) and from 0.94 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.09) to 0.63 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.72), respectively. This 10-fold rise in LTG prescribing in females is much higher than the fivefold rise in males from 0.09 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.14) to 0.47 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.54) per 1000 male population. Conclusion: The practice of prescribing antiepileptic drugs in adolescents has changed gradually over the last decade. More females aged 12-18 years are prescribed LTG than CBZ or VPA and the increase is much greater than for males. The increase in LTG prescribing mirrors a corresponding decrease in both VPA and CBZ. Concerns about potential problems to offspring appear to be affecting prescription trends in adolescent females of child-bearing potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据