4.7 Article

Ltraconazole versus fluconazole for prevention of fungal infections in patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplants

期刊

BLOOD
卷 103, 期 4, 页码 1527-1533

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2003-08-2644

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA18029, CA15704] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [K08AI01571] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prophylactic fluconazole prevents candidiasis; however, this drug has no activity against molds. We performed a randomized trial to determine whether prophylactic itraconazole prevents invasive mold infections (IMIs). A total of 304 patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplants (SCT) were randomized to receive fluconazole (400 mg/d) or itraconazole (oral solution 2.5 mg/kg 3 times daily, or intravenous 200 mg daily) for 180 days after SC transplantation, or until 4 weeks after discontinuation of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) therapy. Proven or probable invasive fungal infections (IR) were evaluated by intent-to-treat and on-treatment analyses. More patients in the itraconazole arm developed hepatotoxicities, and more patients were discontinued from itraconazole because of toxicities or gastrointestinal (GI) intolerance (36% versus 16%, P < .001). Intent-to-treat analysis demonstrated no difference in the incidence of IFI during the intended study period (fluconazole 16% versus itraconazole 13%, P = .46); however, fewer patients in the itraconazole arm developed IFI on treatment (fluconazole 15% versus itraconazole 7%, P = .03). ltraconazole provided better protection against IMI (fluconazole 12% versus itraconazole 5%, P = .03), but similar protection against candidiasis (3% versus 2%, P = .69). There was no difference in overall or fungal-free survival. ltraconazole appears to prevent IMI in the subset of patients who tolerate the drug; however, toxicities and poor tolerability limit its success as prophylactic therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据