4.6 Article

Desensitization masks nanomolar potency of ATP for the P2X1 receptor

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 279, 期 8, 页码 6426-6433

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M306987200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ATP-gated P2X(1) receptors feature fast activation and fast desensitization combined with slow recovery from desensitized states. Here, we exploited a non-desensitizing P2X(2)/P2X(1), chimera that includes the entire P2X(1) ectodomain (Werner, P., Seward, E. P., Buell, G. N., and North, M A. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 1548515490) to obtain a macroscopic representation of intrinsic receptor kinetics without bias arising from the overlap of channel activation and desensitization. From the stationary currents made amenable to analysis by this chimera, an EC50 for ATP of 3.3 nm was derived, representing a >200- and >7000-fold higher ATP potency than observed for the parental P2X(1) and P2X(2A) receptors, respectively. Also, other agonists activated the P2X(2)/P2X(1), chimera with nanomolar EC50 values ranging from 3.5 to 73 nm in the following rank order: 2-methylthio-ATP, 2',3'-O-(4-benzoylbenzoyl)-ATP, alpha,beta-methylene-ATP, adenosine 5'-0-(3-thiotriphosphate). Upon washout, the P2X(2)/P2X(1) chimera deactivated slowly with a time constant (ranging from 63 to 2.5 s) that is inversely related to the EC50 value for the corresponding agonist. This suggests that deactivation time courses reflect unbinding rates, which by themselves define agonist potencies. The P2X(2)/P2X(1) chimera and the P2X(1) receptor possess virtually identical sensitivity to inhibition by the P2X(1) receptor-selective antagonist NF279, a suramin analog. These results suggest that the P2X(1), ectodomain confers nanomolar ATP sensitivity, which, within the wild-type P2X(1) receptor, is obscured by desensitization such that only a micromolar ATP potency can be deduced from peak current measurements, representing an amalgam of activation and desensitization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据