4.6 Article

Generation and characterization of a highly stable form of activated thrombin-activable fibrinolysis inhibitor

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 279, 期 8, 页码 6620-6628

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M307337200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activated thrombin-activable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFIa) is a carboxypeptidase B that can down-regulate fibrinolysis. TAFIa is a labile enzyme that can be inactivated by conformational instability or proteolysis. TAFI is similar to 40% identical to pancreatic carboxypeptidase B (CPB). In contrast to TAFIa, pancreatic CPB is a stable protease. We hypothesized that regions or residues that are not conserved in TAFIa compared with pancreatic CPB play a role in the conformational instability of TAFIa and that replacement of these non-conserved residues with residues of pancreatic CPB would lead to a TAFIa molecule with an increased stability. Therefore, we have expressed, purified, and characterized two TAFI-CPB chimeras: TAFI-CPB-(293-333) and TAFI-CPB-(293-401). TAFI-CPB-(293-333) could be activated by thrombin-thrombomodulin, but not as efficiently as wild-type TAFI. After activation, this mutant was unstable and was hardly able to prolong clot lysis of TAFI-deficient plasma. Binding of TAFI-CPB-(293-333) to both plasminogen and fibrinogen was normal compared with wild-type TAFI. TAFI-CPB-(293-401) could be activated by thrombin-thrombomodulin, although at a lower rate compared with wild-type TAFI. The activated mutant displayed a markedly prolonged half-life of 1.5 h. Plasmin could both activate and inactivate this chimera. Interestingly, this chimera did not bind to plasminogen or fibrinogen. TAFI-CPB-(293-401) could prolong the clot lysis time in TAFI-deficient plasma, although not as efficiently as wild-type TAFI. In conclusion, by replacing a region in TAFI with the corresponding region in pancreatic CPB, we were able to generate a TAFIa form with a highly stable activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据