4.7 Article

Transpiration, canopy conductance and the decoupling coefficient of a lowland mixed dipterocarp forest in Sarawak, Borneo: dry spell effects

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
卷 287, 期 1-4, 页码 237-251

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.10.002

关键词

transpiration; canopy conductance; aerodynamic conductance; decoupling coefficient; eddy covariance; tropical rainforest

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tropical rainforests are among the most important biomes in terms of annual primary productivity and water cycling, However, the materials-exchange properties of Southeast Asian forests in their significant functions are less studied. We investigate key factors controlling materials-exchange, such as canopy (g,) and aerodynamic conductance (g.) and the decoupling coefficient (n) in an intact lowland mixed dipterocarp forest in Sarawak, Borneo. We operated an eddy covariance system above the canopy to measure canopy transpiration rate (E,) using an 80-m-tall canopy crane, and made concurrent meteorological measurements. In this region, solar radiation and air temperature have small seasonal variations, and annual rainfall is distributed evenly throughout the year, with some unpredictable intra-annual dry spells. We define three specific periods A, B and C as medium dry, heavy dry and wet periods, respectively, for analyses of the environmental control on E, according to their dryness level. The mean daily E, g, and D were higher in the wet period C than in the dry periods A and B. Also, each g, in its diurnal variation was much higher in the wet period C than in the dry periods A and B, where diurnal variations of g(c) were almost the same. Both the value of g, and its sensitivity to environmental variables were higher in the wet period C than in the dry periods A and B. The peak of n was higher in the wet period C than in the dry periods A and B because of a higher value of gc in period C. However, the higher values of gc in the wet period C did not cause a higher E, compared to in the dry periods A and B. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据