4.5 Article

Anisotropic ionic transport properties in La2NiO4+δ single crystals

期刊

SOLID STATE IONICS
卷 167, 期 3-4, 页码 341-347

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2003.12.012

关键词

mixed conductivity; tracer diffusion; 2D conductivity; single crystals; oxygen reduction; electrocatalytic properties; mixed conductor La2NiO4+delta

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The anisotropy of anionic conductivity in a mixed conductor oxide (La2NiO4+delta) with the 2D K2NiF4-type structure was measured on a high-quality single crystal. We report measurements of the oxygen diffusivity parallel and perpendicular to the [001] direction, from 450 to 900 degreesC, using the technique combining isotopic O-16/O-18 exchange and secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS) spectroscopy. The diffusion is about one to two orders of magnitude higher in the (a,b) plane when compared to the perpendicular direction. The activation energy of the diffusion measured in the (a,b) plane is close to the one (E-a similar to 0.9 eV) measured in the ceramics and in agreement, as expected, with a mechanism involving the interstitial oxygen O-i(2-) as major diffusing species. This prevailing mechanism may explain, at least partly, the good efficiency of such materials when used as cathodes in solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) devices. Although the diffusivity parallel to the [001] axis is small, its activation energy is about four times weaker (E-a similar to 0.25 eV) than the one observed in the (a,b) plane. This result is in agreement with a non-stoichiometry model involving anti-phase boundaries in such materials, which induce the stabilization of oxygen vacancies in the NiO2 layers. The corresponding proposed mechanism involves the transfer of smaller O-i(-) species, with a low concentration but a high mobility. Furthermore, electronic conduction seems to play a key role in this mechanism. Finally, we measured a low anisotropy for the values of the surface exchange coefficients. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据