4.5 Article

Mechanisms of cadmium toxicity in terrestrial pulmonates: Programmed cell death and metallothionein overload

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 648-655

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1897/02-617

关键词

Helix pomatia; hepatopancreas; cadmium; metallothionein; programmed cell death

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A sublethal dose of cadmium (Cd(2+)) administered via the diet during short-term exposure over 10 d induced programmed cell death in the hepatopancreas of the terrestrial pulmonate snail Helix pomatia. Condensed cell residues were predominantly phagocytosed by calcium cells, suggesting a specific function of these epithelial cells in metal detoxification or in clearing the organ of cellular debris from cell death. The considerable cell loss recorded by histological analysis was accompanied by enhanced cell proliferation. Intoxication with Cd was further associated with the pronounced abundance of residual bodies, predominantly recorded in excretory cells, and with pathological changes in the endoplasmic reticulum. During long-term Cd exposure, mortality increased with increasing Cd concentrations in the diet, as demonstrated by feeding experiments in the laboratory. Lethal effects of Cd appeared to be correlated with Cd overloading of the Cd-specific metallothionein isoform (Cd-MT), isolated and characterized previously from the animal's hepatopancreas. Stoichiometric analysis shows that the capacity of Cd-MT to bind six molar equivalents of Cd corresponds to a tissue Cd concentration of approximately 4 mumol/g dry weight. At this tissue concentration, all high-affinity metal-binding sites of Cd-MT are occupied by Cd(2+). Cadmium exposure beyond this level gives rise to progressive destabilization of Cd-MT cluster structure in vitro, resulting in increasing proportions of weakly bound, or even unbound, Cd(2+) ions. Our results suggest that in vivo, the observed overburdening of Cd-MT with Cd(2+) reduces the viability of affected animals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据