4.8 Article

Sorption and degradation of steroid hormones in soils during transport: Column studies and model evaluation

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 38, 期 5, 页码 1460-1470

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es034898e

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural and synthetic analogues of steroid hormones and their metabolites have emerged as contaminants of concern. Characterizing sorption and degradation processes is essential to assess the environmental distribution, persistence, and ecological significance of steroid hormones in terrestrial and aquatic systems. We examined the fate and transport of testosterone and 17beta-estradiol by conducting a series of fast-flow-velocity transport experiments under pulse-type and flow-interruption boundary conditions in columns packed with a surface soil, freshwater sediment, and two sands. Flow-interruption experiments provided independent estimates of degradation coefficients for the parent hormones and their metabolites, while pulse-input type experiments were used to identify transport mechanisms for hormones by employing forward modeling approaches. Estimated degradation rate coefficients (k) for the hormones from flow-interruption experiments ranged from 0.003 to 0.015 h(-1) for testosterone and from 0.0003 to 0.075 h(-1) for estradiol, similar to those observed in batch studies. Degradation rate coefficients for the two primary metabolites were 1-2 orders of magnitude larger than those for the parent chemicals. Estimated k values decreased with column life as a result of nutrient depletion. Large sorption by soils of the parent and metabolites (log K-OC approximate to 2.77-3.69) did not appear to hinder degradation; k values were an order of magnitude smaller than the estimated sorption mass-transfer constants. Differences in hormone breakthrough curves from a single-pulse displacement and those predicted using independently estimated parameters suggest that modeling hormone degradation as a simple first-order kinetic process may be sufficient, but not accurate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据