期刊
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 23-38出版社
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.3102/01623737026001023
关键词
literacy education; meta-analysis; student achievement; students at risk
We conducted a meta-analysis of 36 studies of Reading Recovery (RR), an intensive tutorial intervention designed to develop the literacy skills of low-performing first-grade students. Few individual studies of the program have yielded conclusive evidence regarding the program's effectiveness due to various methodological limitations. We relied on specific meta-analytic strategies to combine as much available evidence as possible to study overall program effects. We also analyzed the results from the few more rigorously designed studies separately. In general, we found positive program effects for both discontinued and not discontinued students on outcomes tailored to the program and standardized achievement measures. RR effects were most pronounced, however,for discontinued students on measures designed for the program. Contrary to conventional belief we found no evidence suggesting that prior observed effects could be explained completely by factors resulting from methodological flaws (e.g., regression artifacts).
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据