4.7 Article

Emissions of 1,3-Dichloropropene and Chloropicrin after Soil Fumigation under Field Conditions

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 63, 期 22, 页码 5354-5363

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b01309

关键词

soil fumigation; volatilization; emissions; Telone C-35; 1,3-dichloropropene; chloropicrin; bare soil; field experiment; shank injection; Industrial Source Complex Short-Term model (ISCST3); CALPUFF dispersion model; aerodynamic gradient method

资金

  1. California Air Resources Board [05-351]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil fumigation is an important agronomic practice in the production of many high-value vegetable and fruit crops, but the use of chemical fumigants can lead to excessive atmospheric emissions. A large-scale (2.9 ha) field experiment was conducted to obtain volatilization and cumulative emission rates for two commonly used soil fumigants under typical agronomic practices: 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) and chloropicrin. The aerodynamic method and the indirect back-calculation method using ISCST3 and CALPUFF dispersion models were used to estimate flux loss from the treated field. Over the course of the experiment, the daily peak volatilization rates ranged from 12 to 30 mu g m(-2) s(-1) for 1,3-D and from 0.7 to 2.6 mu g m(-2) s(-1) for chloropicrin. Depending on the method used for quantification, total emissions of 1,3-D and chloropicrin, respectively, ranged from 16 to 35% and from 0.3 to 1.3% of the applied fumigant. A soil incubation study showed that the low volatilization rates measured for chloropicrin were due to particularly high soil degradation rates observed at this field site. Understanding and quantifying fumigant emissions from agricultural soil will help in developing best management practices to reduce emission losses, reducing adverse impacts to human and ecosystem health, and providing inputs for conducting risk assessments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据