4.8 Article

IκBα and IκBβ possess injury context-specific functions that uniquely influence hepatic NF-κB induction and inflammation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 113, 期 5, 页码 746-755

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI17337

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK51315, P30 DK54759, P30 DK054759, R01 DK051315] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IkappaB proteins play an important role in regulating NF-kappaB induction following a diverse range of environmental injuries. Studies evaluating IkappaBbeta knock-in mice (AKBI), in which the IkappaBalpha a gene is replaced by the IkappaBbeta cDNA, have uncovered divergent properties of IkappaBalpha and IkappaBbeta that influence their ability to activate hepatic NF-kappaB and subsequent downstream proinflammatory processes in a stimulus-specific manner. While AKBI mice demonstrated identical levels of hepatic NF-kappaB activation in response to endotoxin, a significantly reduced level of hepatic NF-kappaB activation was observed in AKBI mice after liver ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. This reduced level of NF-kappaB activation in AKBI mice after liver I/R also correlated with decreased induction of serum TNF-alpha, reduced hepatic inflammation, and increased survival. In contrast, no differences in any of these indicators were observed between AKBI mice and WT littermates after a lethal injection of LPS. Molecular studies suggest that the specificity of IkappaBalpha, but not IkappaBbeta to properly regulate NF-kappaB induction during the acute phase of I/R injury is due to injury context-specific activation of c-Src and subsequent tyrosine phosphorylation of IKBalpha on Tyr42. These results demonstrate that IkappaBalpha and IkappaBbeta play unique injury context-specific roles in activating NF-kappaB-mediated proinflammatory responses and suggest that strategies aimed at inhibiting IkappaBalpha gene expression may be of potential therapeutic benefit in hepatic I/R injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据