4.6 Review

Interstellar ice:: The Infrared Space Observatory legacy

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
卷 151, 期 1, 页码 35-73

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/381182

关键词

dust, extinction; infrared : ISM; ISM : abundances; ISM : molecules; line : profiles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present 2.5-30 mum spectra from the Short-Wavelength Spectrometer of the Infrared Space Observatory for a total of 23 sources. The sources include embedded young stellar objects spanning a wide range of mass and luminosity, together with field stars sampling quiescent dark clouds and the diffuse interstellar medium. Expanding on results of previous studies, we use these spectra to investigate ice composition as a function of environment. The spectra reveal an extremely rich set of absorption features attributed to simple molecules in the ices. We discuss the observed properties of these absorption features and review their assignments. Among the species securely identified are H2O, CO, CO2, CH3OH, and CH4. Likely identified species include OCS, H2CO, and HCOOH. There is also evidence for NH3 and OCN- ice features, but these identifications are more controversial. Features that continue to defy identification include the 3.3-3.7 mum ice band wing'' and the bulk of the 6.8 mum feature. In addition, we find evidence for excess absorption at 6.0 mum that cannot be attributed to H2O ice. We examine the degree of intercorrelation of the 6.8 mum, 4.62 mum (XCN'') and 6.0 mum (excess) features. Our results are consistent with the interpretation of the 6.8 and 4.62 mum features as due to NH4+ and OCN- ions, respectively, though alternative explanations cannot currently be ruled out. We find that the optical depth correlations are dependent on the profile of the 6.8 mum feature but not on the mass of the YSO nor the ice temperature along the line of sight. We discuss the implications for our current understanding of ice processing. We briefly discuss the composition, origin, and evolution of interstellar ices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据