4.4 Article

Silk sericin ameliorates wound healing and its clinical efficacy in burn wounds

期刊

ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 305, 期 7, 页码 585-594

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00403-013-1371-4

关键词

Sericin; Healing; Silver sulfadiazine; Burn; Wound

资金

  1. Thailand Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of silk sericin, a protein from silkworm cocoon, on scratch wound healing in vitro. For applicable result in clinical use, we also study the efficacy of sericin added to a standard antimicrobial cream, silver zinc sulfadiazine, for open wound care in the treatment of second-degree burn wounds. In vitro scratch assays show that sericin at concentration 100 mu g/mL can promote the migration of fibroblast L929 cells similar to epidermal growth factor (positive control) at 100 mu g/mL. After 1 day of treatment, the length of scratch in wounds treated with sericin was significantly shorter than the length of negative control wounds (culture medium without sericin). For clinical study, a total of 29 patients with 65 burn wounds which covered no less than 15 % of total body surface area were randomly assigned to either control (wounds treated with silver zinc sulfadiazine cream) or treatment (wounds treated with silver zinc sulfadiazine with added sericin cream) group in this randomized, double-blind, standard-controlled study. The results showed that the average time to reach 70 % re-epithelialization of the burned surface and complete healing in the treatment group was significantly shorter, approximately 5-7 days, than in the control group. Regarding time for complete healing, control wounds took approximately 29.28 +/- A 9.27 days, while wounds treated with silver zinc sulfadiazine with added sericin cream took approximately 22.42 +/- A 6.33 days, (p = 0.001). No infection or severe reaction was found in any wounds. This is the first clinical study to show that silk sericin is safe and beneficial for burn wound treatment when it is added to silver sulfadiazine cream.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据